Avionics · persistence
See which Missions are meant to remain awake, which are currently clear for bounded work, and where authority returns to the Pilot. Mission definitions remain separate from whichever LLM or scheduler happens to execute the next wake.
Wake armed
9
Held by authority
0
Persistent Missions
15
Sovereignty boundary
This cockpit reads durable Flightdeck Mission state. Today, provider-native scheduling can still act as an execution adapter. The FD-owned schedule registry, condition engine, router, retries, and failover backend remain a build target and are not represented here as complete.
FD owns now
Mission identity, persistence flag, wake intent, Authority Envelope state, evidence and Flight Log
Adapter may own temporarily
Clock trigger and provider-specific invocation
Next sovereignty layer
FD schedule registry → authority check → model router → durable writeback → materiality alert
Mission lanes
Build and calibrate Founder’s Flightdeck itself, beginning with the cockpit and progressively extending Avionics through real Mission use.
Current bounded action
Keep the six verified Mission 1 build lanes under real-use observation. Reopen only the affected lane when a concrete usability, authority, freshness, dependency, learning, or verification gap appears; continue unrelated authorized Missions independently.
Determine where the Board adds materially different perspectives and judgment value inside Founder’s Flightdeck, and evolve it only where evidence supports it.
Current bounded action
No delegated next action recorded.
Develop a reliable Coding Team capability that can receive bounded work, produce verified changes, preserve human approval gates, and operate without manual prompt handoffs.
Current bounded action
No delegated next action recorded.
Research, challenge, strengthen, revise, or reject the Founder’s Flightdeck V1 thesis as evidence changes; turn supported findings into useful public content and progressively build the audience, distribution, and governed automation capabilities required to operate the thesis campaign.
Current bounded action
Build and run the M2.0 Proof Card first: recover and reverify evidence for and against AI-assisted Human Judgment training, including dependence, automation-bias, skill-atrophy, and independent-capability counterevidence; connect credible evidence to the durable assumption before changing confidence.
Identify, test, and prioritize realistic near-term revenue opportunities for SproutCo Labs while protecting the longer-term Founder’s Flightdeck mission.
Current bounded action
No delegated next action recorded.
Temporary Mission created during Mission 2 bootstrap and superseded by the preserved original Founder’s Flightdeck thesis Mission.
Current bounded action
Decompose V1 into explicit research claims and assumptions, then identify the first evidence-seeking research pass without treating V1 as settled truth.
Evaluate, adapt, and operationalize Mike Kabani’s Claude Code Marketing Suite as a governed, reusable marketing capability for Founder’s Flightdeck Missions; begin by gathering requirements, mapping skills, dependencies, authority boundaries, and validation gates before implementation.
Current bounded action
Gather the Mission 3 requirements: inventory the marketing suite and its skills, identify required inputs and outputs, map dependencies and permissions, define evidence and quality checks, identify authority boundaries, and separate reusable Flightdeck capabilities from suite-specific behavior.
Discover, test, and calibrate the smallest standard Founder’s Flightdeck Mission template that can launch diverse Missions in planning mode, separating universal Mission avionics from goal-specific add-ons and skills.
Current bounded action
Gather the Mission 4 requirements by comparing Missions 1, 2, and 3: identify what every Mission requires, what is optional, what belongs in core Avionics, what belongs in add-ons or Skills, and what Planning Mode must learn before recommending additional capabilities.
Parent: Mission 2 — Founder’s Flightdeck Thesis Research. Claim: AI is increasing the speed of execution faster than organizations are increasing their speed of understanding. Falsifier: Organizations generally increase understanding at roughly the same rate as AI-accelerated execution without meaningful lag or new failure modes.
Current bounded action
Build the Proof Card: define supporting evidence, contradictory evidence, best source categories, and the cheapest credible first test; then begin evidence acquisition on both sides of the claim.
Parent: Mission 2 — Founder’s Flightdeck Thesis Research. Claim: When execution outpaces understanding, organizations incur real and consequential risk. Falsifier: Execution can routinely outrun organizational understanding without meaningful degradation in decisions, outcomes, control, or resilience.
Current bounded action
Build the Proof Card: define supporting evidence, contradictory evidence, best source categories, and the cheapest credible first test; then begin evidence acquisition on both sides of the claim.
Parent: Mission 2 — Founder’s Flightdeck Thesis Research. Claim: Increasing the speed of understanding creates measurable organizational advantage. Falsifier: Faster organizational understanding produces little or no material improvement in outcomes relative to execution speed alone.
Current bounded action
Build the Proof Card: define supporting evidence, contradictory evidence, best source categories, and the cheapest credible first test; then begin evidence acquisition on both sides of the claim.
Parent: Mission 2 — Founder’s Flightdeck Thesis Research. Claim: A continuous Mission operating loop can materially reduce understanding lag. Falsifier: A continuous Mission loop adds overhead without materially improving detection, understanding, decision quality, or adaptation speed.
Current bounded action
Build the Proof Card: define supporting evidence, contradictory evidence, best source categories, and the cheapest credible first test; then begin evidence acquisition on both sides of the claim.
Parent: Mission 2 — Founder’s Flightdeck Thesis Research. Claim: The primary bottleneck is not simply access to more intelligence, but governed context, memory, evidence, and accumulated judgment. Falsifier: Frontier intelligence alone is consistently sufficient for reliable organizational decisions without persistent governed context or accumulated judgment.
Current bounded action
Remain staged until the active critical flight group produces enough evidence to justify expanding the thesis research envelope.
Parent: Mission 2 — Founder’s Flightdeck Thesis Research. Claim: Humans must retain consequential authority even when AI systems operate faster than humans can continuously supervise. Falsifier: AI systems reliably handle consequential decisions across ambiguity and conflicting objectives with no meaningful benefit from retained accountable human authority.
Current bounded action
Remain staged until the active critical flight group produces enough evidence to justify expanding the thesis research envelope.
Parent: Mission 2 — Founder’s Flightdeck Thesis Research. Claim: Explicit Authority Envelopes make greater AI autonomy safer and more useful. Falsifier: Explicit authority boundaries create mostly bureaucracy, fail to reduce meaningful risk, or restrict useful autonomy without corresponding benefit.
Current bounded action
Remain staged until the active critical flight group produces enough evidence to justify expanding the thesis research envelope.
Parent: Mission 2 — Founder’s Flightdeck Thesis Research. Claim: Persistent Mission memory improves decisions because new evidence can propagate into assumptions, decisions, trajectory, and future action. Falsifier: Persistent Mission history adds little value, becomes noise, or fails to improve subsequent judgment and course correction.
Current bounded action
Remain staged until the active critical flight group produces enough evidence to justify expanding the thesis research envelope.
Parent: Mission 2 — Founder’s Flightdeck Thesis Research. Claim: Good governance can expand the usable envelope of AI rather than merely constrain it. Falsifier: Governance consistently slows useful work more than it increases trust, autonomy, reliability, or safe scale.
Current bounded action
Remain staged until the active critical flight group produces enough evidence to justify expanding the thesis research envelope.
Parent: Mission 2 — Founder’s Flightdeck Thesis Research. Claim: The durable competitive advantage will increasingly belong to organizations that learn faster, not merely execute faster. Falsifier: Execution speed alone remains the dominant differentiator even when competitors have similar access to AI capability.
Current bounded action
Remain staged until the active critical flight group produces enough evidence to justify expanding the thesis research envelope.
Parent: Mission 2 — Founder’s Flightdeck Thesis Research. Claim: AI can be used not merely to perform cognitive work for people, but to measurably strengthen a person’s ability to understand changing reality, recognize meaningful patterns, and make better judgment calls over time. Falsifier: AI-assisted systems that attempt to train judgment do not produce durable improvements in human recognition, reasoning, calibration, transfer, or decision quality beyond temporary task assistance, or they create dependence that weakens independent human capability.
Current bounded action
Build the Proof Card: define supporting evidence, contradictory evidence, best source categories, and the cheapest credible first test; then begin evidence acquisition on both sides of the claim.